Backup System
Do You Have One - Does Yours Work?
If your main file server crashed today, do you know how to recover your data? Most have backup systems, but you would be surprised at how many businesses don’t know how to restore that data, AND, ARE YOU BACKING UP THE RIGHT STUFF?
What would it cost you to be separated from your data for one hour, one day, or to have to reconstruct and recompile basic data? You not only need to count the down-time of valuable resources (employees), but also the loss of what they would have been doing had the crash not occurred. Are you sure you can reconstruct all of the data that you need? And then there is the poor customer that is not receiving service during the down-time. Therefore, backups should be of serious concern to all businesses.
Tape is the tried and true method for effective backups. The advantage of tape is that it can be easily carried off-site in case of fire or other disaster. In addition, tape lends itself to weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly archives. The disadvantage, due to it’s sequential storage nature, is that it takes a long time to find and restore files at the end of the tape AND tape is somewhat fragile.
NAS (Network Attached Storage) used as a backup system is like a small inexpensive file server that attaches to your network. NAS can be mapped as a network drive (drive F: for example) or as a network place, whereby one can save data directly.
Due to it’s random access qualities, it can also be used as a fast and effective backup system. By using two NAS devices, one is used to backup data on “odd nights” (Monday Wednesday Friday) whilst the “even night” backup (Tuesday Thursday Saturday) is carried off site in case of fire. About the size of a paperback book, weighing in at around ½ pound, and a price point less than a single tape drive, NAS is proving to be a true contender in the backup world. In fact, for the price of an 80 gig tape system you can get two 250 gig NAS systems (as of the date of this writing).
However, the real trick is to plan your backups so that you backup the right stuff AND THEN know how to retrieve or restore that data when you need it. To accomplish this we recommend a Backup System Review. The Backup System Review will document the backup procedure, detail the files that are included in the backup, detail the restore procedures, and will test the backup to make certain that the files are good. Armed with a backup system and the know-how to use it, a data crash can become a momentary blip in an otherwise perfect day.
- Log in to post comments



1 comment
OBvmQDfwxRsxdXSYDF
Submitted by Rudi (not verified) on Sun, 04/22/2012 - 02:12AriI supported your shift of focus to the N800 poivrded that the 770 continued to receive bug fixes.Judging from the recent comments being left against 770 bugs in Bugzilla, Nokia don't plan on fixing any more 770 bugs. And now you say no new OS 2006 builds, and attempt to justify this by reminding us of the last OS 2006 build which offered NOTHING of any real value or significance!Bugzilla is full of long standing 770 bugs which have never been addressed - when did you really end 770 support, September 2006 when you went into overdrive on OS 2007? And then you just whipped up a last minute OS 2006 final build in November with a couple of WiFi bug fixes in order to keep the old customers happy? Because they really are that stupid and gullible?Quite honestly, your past comments of continued support have not been matched by your groups subsequent actions and this saddens me greatly, and demonstrates a certain lack of honesty on your part. A single minor firmware release for OS 2006 and no further bug fixes does not equate to "support" which is how I think most 770 owners percieved your comments. Judging by your actions, you've bailed on your loyal 770 owners - the only "support" you (Nokia) will be offering these customers is through Nokia Customer Service and only then, I'm sure, because you have legal obligations you cannot avoid since hardware warranties must be honoured. Software though, well that's a different matter isn't it?At least fix _some_ of the damned 770/OS2006 bugs - particularly as many of them are equally applicable in OS 2007. Some of these bugs are quite trivial, yet Nokia HAVE refused to fix them - read the newsgroup posting from my earlier comment which links to bugs with comments "WILL NOT FIX". And now also you admit there will be no further OS 2006 release - that's another admission of "WILL NOT FIX", at least for 770 owners.I hate to say this, but stop treating your customers with such utter contempt. You would be a fool to repeat the 770s sham offer of continued support with any successor to the N800 - you've been rumbled at the first hurdle.